|
|
 Hot Tub Fritz

Posts: 8321
      Location: Kennesaw, GA | Magic_Hat - 2010-02-11 5:31 PM
Clearly you underestimate the importance of the debate before us.
XX-X. Serious Business.
Uh, now you're on crack. The Roman numeral system had NO allowance for such silliness as things like "Twenty Ten." You might have all sorts of evidence to suggest why it should be Twenty Ten in the vernacular, but in Roman numerals it would be MMX. This is Not. Even. Debatable. XX-X. What kind of craziness is that? |
|
| |
|
 A.W.E.S.O.M.-O

Posts: 4556
     Location: Standing right behind you | Steve - 2010-02-12 8:33 AM
XX-X. What kind of craziness is that?
That's stutter porn. |
|
| |
|
 Drunkard
Posts: 1758
      Location: CT | Steve - 2010-02-12 8:33 AM
Magic_Hat - 2010-02-11 5:31 PM
Clearly you underestimate the importance of the debate before us.
XX-X. Serious Business.
Uh, now you're on crack. The Roman numeral system had NO allowance for such silliness as things like "Twenty Ten." You might have all sorts of evidence to suggest why it should be Twenty Ten in the vernacular, but in Roman numerals it would be MMX. This is Not. Even. Debatable. XX-X. What kind of craziness is that?
Yea, I guess you're right. There's no way you could make eye-holes for glasses with XX-X. Although you could look between the Xes in the year XX-XX.  |
|
| |
|
 Heavy drinker
Posts: 476
       Location: S.E. Michigan | Kris - 2010-02-12 11:05 AM
Steve - 2010-02-12 8:33 AM
XX-X. What kind of craziness is that?
That's stutter porn.
Shit. I saw the end of this thread, with the roman numeral years, the cross-over triple X and porn references and my weird ass mind just bent. I started envisioning porn from the year 30...
Jesus, Mary is showing here ankles again! And I can see her hair! I'm feeling funny...you know...down there. |
|
| |
|
 Boozehound
Posts: 972
       Location: Leeds, UK | Did the romans even have decimal places? MM and X could only ever be 2010. |
|
| |